Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28268
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaylik, R-
dc.contributor.authorSzameitat, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, AL-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, RA-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T15:40:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-09T15:40:43Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-15-
dc.identifierORCID iD: André J. Szameitat https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9387-7722-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Adrian L. Williams https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9989-4440-
dc.identifier136915-
dc.identifier.citationSaylik, R. et al. (2022) 'Functional neuroanatomical correlates of contingency judgement', Neuroscience Letters, 791, 136915, pp. 1 - 6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136915.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0304-3940-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28268-
dc.descriptionData availability: Data, stimuli and other materials are available on: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/functional_neuroanatomical_correlates_of_contingency_judgment/19768618 .en_US
dc.description.abstractContingency judgement is an ability to detect relationships between events and is crucial in the allocation of attentional resources for reasoning, categorization, and decision making to control behaviour in our environment. Research has suggested that the allocation of attention is sensitive to the frequency of contingency information whether it constitutes a negative, zero or positive relationship. The aim of the present study was to explore the functional neuroanatomical correlates of contingency judgement with different frequencies and whether these are distinct from each other or whether they rely on a common mechanism. Using three contingency tasks within a streaming paradigm (one each for negative, zero, and positive contingency frequencies), we assessed brain activity by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 20 participants. Contingency frequency was manipulated between blocks which allowed us to determine the neural correlates of each of the three contingency tasks as well as the common areas of activation. The conjunction of task activation showed activity in left parietal cortices (BA 23, 40) and superior temporal gyrus (BA42). Further, the interaction analysis revealed distinct areas that mainly involve lateral (BA 45) and medial (BA 9) prefrontal cortices in the judgment of negative contingencies compared with positive and zero contingencies. We interpret the finding as evidence that the shared regions may be involved in coding, integration, and updating of associative relations and distinct regions may be involved in the investment of attentional resources to varied degrees in the computation of contingencies to make a judgment.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 6-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectcontingency learningen_US
dc.subjectassociative relationsen_US
dc.subjectshared and diverse areasen_US
dc.subjectlateral prefrontal lobeen_US
dc.subjectparietal lobeen_US
dc.subjectfMRIen_US
dc.titleFunctional neuroanatomical correlates of contingency judgementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136915-
dc.relation.isPartOfNeuroscience Letters-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume791-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7972-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).2.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons