Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8800
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchützwohl, A-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-29T11:10:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-29T11:10:01Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationEvolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), 92 - 99, 2008en_US
dc.identifier.issn1090-5138-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513807001146en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8800-
dc.descriptionThis is the post-print version of the final paper published in Evolution and Human Behavior. The published article is available from the link below. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. Copyright @ 2008 Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.description.abstractThree studies tested the hypothesis derived from evolutionary psychological considerations of sex differences in the intentional object of romantic jealousy. In Studies 1 and 3, participants had to indicate in a forced choice whether their jealousy would be primarily directed towards the partner or the rival. In Study 2, participants rated separately the extent to which their jealousy would be primarily aimed at the partner and the rival. In Studies 1 and 2, the participants' answers referred to either a mate's actual emotional or sexual infidelity; in Study 3 they referred to suspected infidelity. As predicted, in each study, significantly more women than men reported that their jealousy would be primarily directed at the rival. Also, as predicted, these sex differences were especially pronounced when confronted with the adaptively primary infidelity type (i. e., male emotional and female sexual infidelity, respectively). Finally, Study 3 additionally showed that these sex differences are moderated by the participants' current relationship status and their own unfaithfulness. Limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaften_US
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectJealousyen_US
dc.subjectSexual infidelityen_US
dc.subjectEmotional infidelityen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionary psychologyen_US
dc.subjectSex differencesen_US
dc.subjectIntentional objecten_US
dc.titleThe intentional object of romantic jealousyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.10.002-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Health and Life Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Health and Life Sciences/Dept of Life Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Staff by College/Department/Division/College of Health and Life Sciences/Dept of Life Sciences/Psychology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology-
Appears in Collections:Psychology
Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf260.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.