Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/7751
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNorth, JS-
dc.contributor.authorHope, ER-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, AM-
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-03T12:27:36Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-03T12:27:36Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(10), 1975-1992, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn0895-2779-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470218.2012.678870en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/7751-
dc.description© 2012 The Experimental Psychology Societyen_US
dc.description.abstractWe present three experiments to identify the specific information sources that skilled participants use to make recognition judgements when presented with dynamic, structured stimuli. A group of less skilled participants acted as controls. In all experiments, participants were presented with filmed stimuli containing structured action sequences. In a subsequent recognition phase, participants were presented with new and previously seen stimuli and were required to make judgements as to whether or not each sequence had been presented earlier (or were edited versions of earlier sequences). In Experiment 1, skilled participants demonstrated superior sensitivity in recognition when viewing dynamic clips compared with static images and clips where the frames were presented in a nonsequential, randomized manner, implicating the importance of motion information when identifying familiar or unfamiliar sequences. In Experiment 2, we presented normal and mirror-reversed sequences in order to distort access to absolute motion information. Skilled participants demonstrated superior recognition sensitivity, but no significant differences were observed across viewing conditions, leading to the suggestion that skilled participants are more likely to extract relative rather than absolute motion when making such judgements. In Experiment 3, we manipulated relative motion information by occluding several display features for the duration of each film sequence. A significant decrement in performance was reported when centrally located features were occluded compared to those located in more peripheral positions. Findings indicate that skilled participants are particularly sensitive to relative motion information when attempting to identify familiarity in dynamic, visual displays involving interaction between numerous features.en_US
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis groupen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectScience & Technologyen_US
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicineen_US
dc.subjectHospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourismen_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Applieden_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectSport Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciences - Other Topicsen_US
dc.titleIdentifying the mechanisms underpinning recognition of structured sequences of actionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.678870-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Sport & Education-
Appears in Collections:Sport
Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf292.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.