Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28634
Title: The assessment of executive function abilities in healthy and neurodegenerative aging—A selective literature review.
Authors: Idowu, MI
Szameitat, AJ
Parton, A
Keywords: executive functions tasks;dual-tasking;inhibition;shifting;working memory updating;cognitive aging;mild cognitive impairment;Alzheimer’s disease
Issue Date: 26-Mar-2024
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Citation: Idowu, M.I., Szameitat, A.J. and Parton, A. (2024) 'The assessment of executive function abilities in healthy and neurodegenerative aging—A selective literature review.', Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 16, 1334309, pp. 1 - 15. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1334309.
Abstract: Numerous studies have examined executive function (EF) abilities in cognitively healthy older adults and those living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Currently, there are no standard accepted protocols for testing specific EFs; thus, researchers have used their preferred tool, which leads to variability in assessments of decline in a particular ability across studies. Therefore, there is a need for guidance as to themost sensitive tests for assessing EF decline. A search of the most current literature published between 2000 and 2022 on EF studies assessing cognitively healthy older adults and individuals living with MCI and AD was conducted using PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Emphasis was placed on the EF’s dual-tasking, inhibition, shifting or switching, and working memory updating. Many tasks and their outcomes were reviewed. Of particular importance was the di􀀀erence in outcomes for tasks applied to the same group of participants. These various EF assessment tools demonstrate di􀀀erences in e􀀀ectively identifying decline in EF ability due to the aging process and neurodegenerative conditions, such as MCI and AD. This review identifies various factors to consider in using particular EF tasks in particular populations, including task demand and stimuli factors, and also when comparing di􀀀ering results across studies.
Description: Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1334309/full#supplementary-material .
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28634
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1334309
Other Identifiers: ORCiD: André J. Szameitat https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9387-7722
ORCiD: Andrew Parton https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0633-7846
1334309
1334309
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 Idowu, Szameitat and Parton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.437.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons