Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27891
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorvan Bergen, NG-
dc.contributor.authorSoekarjo, K-
dc.contributor.authorVan der Kamp, J-
dc.contributor.authorOrth, D-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-20T08:54:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-20T08:54:12Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-22-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Nikki Geerte van Bergen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7203-6446-
dc.identifierORCID iD: John Van der Kamp https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3826-1973-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Dominic Orth https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8844-3815-
dc.identifier.citationvan Bergen, N.G. et al. (2022) 'Reliability and Validity of Functional Grip Strength Measures Across Holds and Body Positions in Climbers: Associations With Skill and Climbing Performance', Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 94 (3), pp. 627 - 637. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2022.2035662.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0270-1367-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27891-
dc.descriptionSupplementary material is available online at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02701367.2022.2035662#supplemental-material-section .en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). Purpose: In climbing, exceptional levels of fingertip strength across different holds and body positions are considered essential for performance. There is no commonly agreed upon way to measure such ”grip strength variability.” Furthermore, the accurate and reliable monitoring of strength is necessary to achieve safe, progressive improvement in strength. Therefore, this study aimed to develop reliability and criterion validity for assessment of grip strength across multiple holds and body positions. Methods: Twenty-two advanced toelite climbers (age = 28.5 ± 8.6 years) performed maximal voluntary isometric contractions on two occasions (for test-retest reliability). Conditions included two hold types (edge and sloper) tested in two postures (elbow flexion [90°] and self-preferred). Climbing performance was determined on two ”difficulty” routes (difficulty increases with each hold): one route composed of only edges and another only of slopers. Results: Test-retest reliability was high (ICC between 0.94–0.99). Significant positive correlations were observed for the forces produced on the sloper test and climbing distance on the sloper route (r = 0.512,p < .05), and for the forces produced on the edge test and climbing distance on the edge route (ρ = 0.579, p < .01). Conclusion: These findings support reliability and validity of the method used to measure grip strength variability with different holds and body positions and suggest that improving strength across different grasping types supports adaptive climbing performance.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSportinnovator/ZonMw grant, project number Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 5380010208.en_US
dc.format.extent627 - 637-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge (Taylor & Francis Group)en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectclimbing specific strengthen_US
dc.subjectelite climbingen_US
dc.subjectfunctional movement variabilityen_US
dc.subjectperformance monitoringen_US
dc.subjectreliability and validity of grip strength testen_US
dc.titleReliability and Validity of Functional Grip Strength Measures Across Holds and Body Positions in Climbers: Associations With Skill and Climbing Performanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2035662-
dc.relation.isPartOfResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport-
pubs.issue3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume94-
dc.identifier.eissn2168-3824-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText .pdfCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.5.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons