Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27869
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBazooyar, B-
dc.contributor.authorShaahmadi, F-
dc.contributor.authorJomekian, A-
dc.contributor.authorMirfasihi, SS-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-17T18:35:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-17T18:35:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-06-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Bahamin Bazooyar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7341-4509-
dc.identifier100444-
dc.identifier.citationBazooyar, B. et al. (2023) 'Carbon capture via aqueous ionic liquids intelligent modelling', Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 8 (December 2023), 100444, pp. 1 - 12, doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100444.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27869-
dc.descriptionData availability: Experimental, predicted, and input data used to build the intelligent framework models are accessible from Brunel University London repository at: https://doi.org/10.17633/rd.brunel.23908371.v1.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2023 The Author(s).. With conventional thermodynamic models, it is challenging to estimate the solubility of a gas in the presence of impurities such as water (H2O). Intelligent models can be utilised for this goal in a computationally efficient manner. In this paper, the carbon dioxide (CO2) solubility in ionic liquids (ILs) containing water is predicted using three intelligence models: artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and least square support vector machine (LSSVM). The shuffled complex evolution (SCE) is used to optimise the intelligent models SVM and LSSVM hyperparameters (σ2 and γ), whereas trial and error are used to determine the optimum numbers of neurons and layers for the ANN. To identify the most efficient model, the capabilities of applied intelligent models for determining solubility were compared. The findings show agreement between the experimental values and model estimations. Given that the coefficient-of-determination (R2) and root-meansquared-error (RMSE) were found to be, respectively, 0.9965 and 0.0104 for the test data points, ANN is shown to be moderately more accurate than SVMs or LSSVM at predicting solubility. It can also be inferred that from a statistical point of view, when fed with parameters such as R2, RMSE, standard deviation (STD), and average-absolute-percentage-deviation (AARD), the ANN model demonstrated superior precision in predicting gas solubilities compared to the SVM and LSSVM models.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 12-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectcarbon capturingen_US
dc.subjectsolubilityen_US
dc.subjectcarbon dioxideen_US
dc.subjectintelligent modelsen_US
dc.subjectionic liquidsen_US
dc.titleCarbon capture via aqueous ionic liquids intelligent modellingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100444-
dc.relation.isPartOfCase Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering-
pubs.issueDecember 2023-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume8-
dc.identifier.eissn2666-0164-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf2.38 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons