Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27652
Title: Latent subtypes of manic and/or irritable episode symptoms in two population-based cohorts
Authors: Arathimos, R
Fabbri, C
Vassos, E
Davis, KAS
Pain, O
Gillett, A
Coleman, JRI
Hanscombe, K
Hagenaars, S
Jermy, B
Corbett, A
Ballard, C
Aarsland, D
Creese, B
Lewis, CM
Keywords: bipolar affective disorders;epidemiology;genetics;mood disorders;subtypes
Issue Date: 4-Jan-2022
Publisher: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Citation: Arathimos, R. et al. (2022) 'Latent subtypes of manic and/or irritable episode symptoms in two population-based cohorts', British Journal of Psychiatry, 221 (6), pp. 722 - 731. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.184.
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Background: Mood disorders are characterised by pronounced symptom heterogeneity, which presents a substantial challenge both to clinical practice and research. Identification of subgroups of individuals with homogeneous symptom profiles that cut across current diagnostic categories could provide insights in to the transdiagnostic relevance of individual symptoms, which current categorical diagnostic systems cannot impart. Aims: To identify groups of people with homogeneous clinical characteristics, using symptoms of manic and/or irritable mood, and explore differences between groups in diagnoses, functional outcomes and genetic liability. Method: We used latent class analysis on eight binary self-reported symptoms of manic and irritable mood in the UK Biobank and PROTECT studies, to investigate how individuals formed latent subgroups. We tested associations between the latent classes and diagnoses of psychiatric disorders, sociodemographic characteristics and polygenic risk scores. Results: Five latent classes were derived in UK Biobank (N = 42 183) and were replicated in the independent PROTECT cohort (N = 4445), including ‘minimally affected’, ‘inactive restless’, active restless’, ‘focused creative’ and ‘extensively affected’ individuals. These classes differed in disorder risk, polygenic risk score and functional outcomes. One class that experienced disruptive episodes of mostly irritable mood largely comprised cases of depression/anxiety, and a class of individuals with increased confidence/creativity reported comparatively lower disruptiveness and functional impairment. Conclusions: Findings suggest that data-driven investigations of psychopathological symptoms that include sub-diagnostic threshold conditions can complement research of clinical diagnoses. Improved classification systems of psychopathology could investigate a weighted approach to symptoms, toward a more dimensional classification of mood disorders.
Description: Data availability: Data are available from UK Biobank and PROTECT subject to standard access procedures (www.ukbiobank.ac.uk, www.protectstudy.org.uk/).
Supplementary material: To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.184.
Erratum: This article was published with an error in Figure 1 Section b, which accidentally duplicated the percentage values of Figure 1 Section a. The correct version of the figure is attached below (Erratum.pdf). The publisher apologises for the error.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27652
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.184
ISSN: 0007-1250
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Ryan Arathimos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-500X
ORCID iD: Chiara Fabbri https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0276-7865
ORCID iD: Katrina A. S. Davis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-4646
ORCID iD: Jonathan R. I. Coleman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6759-0944
ORCID iD: Dag Aarsland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6314-216X
ORCID iD: Byron Creese https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6490-6037
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.742.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Erratum.pdfCopyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.284.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons