Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27585
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVincent, S-
dc.contributor.authorLopes, A-
dc.contributor.authorMeliou, E-
dc.contributor.authorÖzbilgin, M-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-08T15:47:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-08T15:47:52Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-09-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Steve Vincent https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9582-3963-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Ana Lopes https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7012-9526-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Elina Meliou https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-3378-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Mustafa F Özbilgin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-9534-
dc.identifier.citationVincent, S. et al. (2024) 'Relational responsibilisation and Equality, Diversity and Inclusion for the 21st Century: The case for reframing equality regulation', Work, Employment and Society, 0 (online first), pp. 1 - 20. doi: 10.1177/09500170231217660..en_US
dc.identifier.issn0950-0170-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27585-
dc.description.abstractThis article critiques equality regulation within neoliberal policy regimes and suggests an alternative. We argue that, globally, neoliberal regimes exacerbate social divisions by individualising responsibilities for addressing inequalities. Consequentially, a new policy direction for equality regulation is required. Using the UK economy as an exemplar, we make the case for relational responsibilisation, which involves raising awareness of workplace inequalities on an international basis; attributing responsibility for inequalities onto specific socioeconomic causes and institutions; and systematically developing policies and practices that extend accountability for and ameliorate the negative consequences of workplace inequalities. Theoretically, Bourdieusian social critique and realist sociological imagination are used to conceive responsibilisation in relational terms and to imagine a policy agenda that might make societies more responsible for tackling the forms of inequality they produce. Our overall argument is for the creation of a new equality, diversity and inclusion-aware form of social democracy.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 20-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications on behalf of British Sociological Associationen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Vincent, S., Lopes, A., Meliou, E., & Özbilgin, M. (2024). Relational Responsibilisation and Diversity Management in the 21st Century: The Case for Reframing Equality Regulation. Work, Employment and Society, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231217660 (see: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use).-
dc.rights.urihttps://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use-
dc.subjectresponsibilisationen_US
dc.subjectsocial democracyen_US
dc.subjectempowermenten_US
dc.subjectequalityen_US
dc.subjectdiversity and inclusionen_US
dc.subjectdiversity managementen_US
dc.titleRelational responsibilisation and Equality, Diversity and Inclusion for the 21st Century: The case for reframing equality regulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231217660-
dc.relation.isPartOfWork, Employment and Society-
pubs.issue00-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume0-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Vincent, S., Lopes, A., Meliou, E., & Özbilgin, M. (2024). Relational Responsibilisation and Diversity Management in the 21st Century: The Case for Reframing Equality Regulation. Work, Employment and Society, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231217660 (see: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use).371.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.