Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27286
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHall, J-
dc.contributor.authorMansfield, L-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-02T08:59:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-02T08:59:21Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-17-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Jennifer Hall https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8379-5555-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Louise Mansfield https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4332-4366-
dc.identifier.citationHall, J. and Mansfiled, L. (2023) 'The Benefits and Complexities of Integrating Mixed Method Findings Using the Pillar Integration Process: A Workplace Health Intervention Case Study', Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 0 (ahead-of-print), pp. 1 - 21. doi: 10.1177/15586898231196287.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1558-6898-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27286-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2023. The Pillar Integration Process was developed to facilitate integration of mixed method data, but there is limited historical application of this approach in complex intervention evaluation. To test the applicability of the technique, this paper presents two case studies examining the efficacy of a workplace intervention. The research included a pilot RCT and process evaluation. The case studies illustrate the benefits of applying the Pillar Integration Process to elicit a comprehensive understanding of intervention efficacy and to design better interventions. This paper contributes to the mixed methods research by advancing the technique through considering inherent philosophical assumptions, and evidencing the value of integrating methods within, as well as across, “qualitative” and “quantitative” categories.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Macmillan cancer support part-funded this research and were one of the participating organizations. Ergotron Inc. provided 25 sit-stand desks for use within this research. The research formed part of the lead author’s PhD study, which was funded by a School of Sport and Education, Brunel University London, PhD bursary.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 21-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsHall, J. and Mansfield, L. (2023) 'The Benefits and Complexities of Integrating Mixed Method Findings Using the Pillar Integration Process: A Workplace Health Intervention Case Study', Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 00 (0), pp. 1-21. Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).. DOI: 10.1177/15586898231196287 (see: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use).-
dc.titleThe Benefits and Complexities of Integrating Mixed Method Findings Using the Pillar Integration Process: A Workplace Health Intervention Case Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231196287-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Mixed Methods Research-
pubs.issueahead-of-print-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-6901-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfHall, J. and Mansfield, L. (2023) 'The Benefits and Complexities of Integrating Mixed Method Findings Using the Pillar Integration Process: A Workplace Health Intervention Case Study', Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 00 (0), pp. 1-21. Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).. DOI: 10.1177/15586898231196287 (see: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use).388.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.