Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26679
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSlijepčević, P-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-19T07:09:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-19T07:09:15Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-01-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Predrag Slijepcevic https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-3598-
dc.identifier.citationSlijepčević, P. (2019) 'Anthropocene, capitalocene, machinocene: Illusions of instrumental reason', Filozofija i Drustvo, 30 (4), pp. 463 - 644. doi: 10.2298/FID1904543S.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0353-5738-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26679-
dc.description.abstractIn their seminal work, Dialectics of Enlightenment, Horkheimer and Adorno interpreted capitalism as the irrational monetization of nature. In the present work, I analyze three 21st century concepts, Anthropocene, Capitalocene and Machinocene, in light of Horkheimer and Adorno’s arguments and recent arguments from the philosophy of biology. The analysis reveals a remarkable prescience of the term “instrumental reason”, which is present in each of the three concepts in a profound and cryptic way. In my interpretation, the term describes the propensity of science based on the notion of physicalism to interpret nature as the machine analyzable and programmable by the human reason. As a result, the Anthropocene concept is built around the mechanicist model, which may be presented as the metaphor of the car without brakes. In a similar fashion, the Machinocene concept predicts the emergence of the mechanical mind, which will dominate nature in the near future. Finally, the Capitalocene concept turns a perfectly rational ambition to expand knowledge into an irrational obsession with over-knowledge, by employing the institutionalized science as the engine of capitalism without brakes. The common denominator of all three concepts is the irrational propensity to legitimize self-destruction. Potential avenues for countering the effects of “instrumental reason” are suggested.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBrunel University Londonen_US
dc.format.extent463 - 644-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theoryen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2019 Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory. Philosophy and Society is an Open Access Journal. All articles can be downloaded free of charge under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC-BY-NC-ND). Predrag Slijepčević, 'Anthropocene, capitalocene, machinocene: Illusions of instrumental reason', Filozofija i drustvo 2019 Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages: 543-570, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1904543S-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectinstrumental reasonen_US
dc.subjectanthropoceneen_US
dc.subjectmachinoceneen_US
dc.subjectcapitaloceneen_US
dc.titleAnthropocene, capitalocene, machinocene: Illusions of instrumental reasonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2298/FID1904543S-
dc.relation.isPartOfFilozofija i Drustvo-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume30-
dc.identifier.eissn2334-8577-
dc.rights.holderInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2019 Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory. Philosophy and Society is an Open Access Journal. All articles can be downloaded free of charge under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC-BY-NC-ND). Predrag Slijepčević, 'Anthropocene, capitalocene, machinocene: Illusions of instrumental reason', Filozofija i drustvo 2019 Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages: 543-570, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1904543S585.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons