Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26174
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKarayiannis, T-
dc.contributor.authorMahmoud, MM-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T15:45:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-22T15:45:04Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-21-
dc.identifier.citationMahmoud, M. M. and Karayiannis, T. G. (2023) ‘Bubble growth models in saturated pool boiling of water on a smooth metallic surface: Assessment and a new recommendation’ in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. Vol. 208., pp. 1 - 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124065.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-9310-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26174-
dc.description.abstractPrediction of bubble growth rate is very important for the development of accurate models for bubble departure diameter and thus the heat transfer rates in nucleate boiling. This paper presents an evaluation study to the existing homogeneous and heterogeneous bubble growth models using our experimental data for bubble growth in saturated pool boiling of deionized water on a plain copper surface. The experiments were conducted at pressures 1, 0.5 and 0.15 bar and superheat in the range 5.1 – 19.5 K. To start with, the paper presents a critical review on bubble growth models in homogeneous and heterogeneous boiling. It was found that homogeneous growth models achieved some partial agreement with the experimental data at some conditions and thus they should be used carefully in heterogeneous boiling. There was a good agreement between some of the models that were suggested based on the assumption that bubble growth occurs due to evaporation from the superheated boundary layer around the bubble. The models based on microlayer evaporation only could not explain the experimental data, i.e. partial agreement at some conditions. The model that predicted the data very well at all conditions was the “relaxation boundary layer” model by Van Stralen [25]. This model was generalized in the current study by suggesting two new empirical models for the departure diameter and departure time.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of the UK, under Grant: EP/S019502/1.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectPool boilingen_US
dc.subjectMetallic surfacesen_US
dc.subjectBubble growth mechanismsen_US
dc.subjectBubble growth modelsen_US
dc.titleBubble Growth Models in Saturated Pool Boiling of Water on a Smooth Metallic Surface: Assessment and a New Recommendationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124065-
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)6.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons