1. Brunel University Research Archive
  2. College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences
  3. Dept of Life Sciences
  4. Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26128
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Barra, M-
dc.contributor.authorBrown, RCH-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T09:26:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-13T09:26:17Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-16-
dc.identifierORCiD: Mícheál de Barra https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-6214-
dc.identifierORCiD: Rebecca C. H. Brown http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8023-1092-
dc.identifier.citationde Barra, M. and Brown, R.C.H.. (2023) 'Public health communication should be more transparent', Nature Human Behaviour, 7 (5), pp. 662 - 664. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01574-0.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26128-
dc.descriptionComment-
dc.description.abstractAn analysis of 2,500 public-health claims reveals that organizations rarely communicate uncertainties around the benefits of behavioural change. To be ethical, public-health communication should be accurate and transparent.en_US
dc.format.extent662 - 664-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01574-0. Rights and permissions: Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. (see: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/journal-policies).-
dc.rights.urihttps://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/journal-policies-
dc.subjectethics-
dc.subjectmedical ethics-
dc.subjectpublic health-
dc.titlePublic health communication should be more transparenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01574-0-
dc.relation.isPartOfNature Human Behaviour-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume7-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01574-0. Rights and permissions: Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. (see: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/journal-policies).176.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.