Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/2562
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, BJ-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, CN-
dc.contributor.authorUshio, U-
dc.contributor.authorLeigh, JR-
dc.contributor.authorKalganova, T-
dc.contributor.authorBaganz, F-
dc.coverage.spatial5en
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-01T14:31:29Z-
dc.date.available2008-08-01T14:31:29Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationBioprocess Biosystems Engineering 26(6): 353-359en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/2562-
dc.description.abstractThis contribution moves in the direction of answering some general questions about the most effective and useful ways of modelling bioprocesses. We investigate the characteristics of models that are good at extrapolating. We trained 3 fully predictive models with different representational structures (diff eqns, inheritance of rates, network of reactions) on Saccharopolyspora erythraea shake flask fermentation data using genetic programming. The models were then tested on unseen data outside the range of the training data and the resulting performances compared. It was found that constrained models with mathematical forms analogous to internal mass balancing and stoichiometric were superior to flexible unconstrained models even though no A priori knowledge of this fermentation was used.en
dc.format.extent1445870 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.titleIntelligent modelling of bioprocesses: A comparison of structured and unstructured approachesen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Electronic and Computer Engineering
Dept of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2004 reformat1.pdf1.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.