Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24782
Title: The effects of face coverings, own‑ethnicity biases, and attitudes on emotion recognition
Authors: Cooper, H
Brar, A
Beyaztas, H
Jennings, BJ
Bennetts, RJ
Keywords: face coverings;own-ethnicity bias;mask attitudes;emotion recognition
Issue Date: 2-Jul-2022
Publisher: SpringerOpen on behalf of the Psychonomic Society
Citation: Cooper. H., Brar. A., Beyaztas. H., Jennings. B.J. and Bennetts. R.J. (2022) 'The effects of face coverings, own-ethnicity biases, and attitudes on emotion recognition', Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7, pp. 1 - 22. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00400-x.
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, face coverings were introduced as a safety measure in certain environments in England and some research suggests that they can affect emotion recognition. Factors such as own-ethnicity bias (e.g. whether people perceiving and expressing emotions are of the same ethnicity) and social biases are also known to influence emotion recognition. However, it is unclear whether these factors interact with face coverings to affect emotion recognition. Therefore, this study examined the effects of face coverings, own-ethnicity biases, and attitudes on emotion recognition accuracy. In this study, 131 participants viewed masked and unmasked emotional faces varying in ethnicity and completed a questionnaire on their attitudes towards face masks. We found that emotion recognition was associated with masks and attitudes: accuracy was lower in masked than unmasked conditions and attitudes towards masks Inside and Outside were associated with emotion recognition. However, a match between perceiver and stimulus ethnicity did not have a significant effect on emotion recognition. Ultimately, our results suggest that masks, and negative attitudes towards them, were associated with poorer emotion recognition. Future research should explore different mask-wearing behaviours and possible in-group/out-group biases and their interaction with other social cues (e.g. in-group biases).
Description: Availability of data and materials: As noted in the paper, the datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the Open Science Framework repository (https://osf.io/57nfe/). A fully programmed version of the experiment is available upon request from the authors.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24782
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401
ISSN: 2365-7464
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.1.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons