Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24528
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaimel, A-
dc.contributor.authorApicella, C-
dc.contributor.authorAtkinson, Q-
dc.contributor.authorBolyanatz, A-
dc.contributor.authorCohen, E-
dc.contributor.authorHandley, C-
dc.contributor.authorHenrich, J-
dc.contributor.authorKundtová Klocová, E-
dc.contributor.authorLang, M-
dc.contributor.authorLesogorol, C-
dc.contributor.authorMathew, S-
dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, R-
dc.contributor.authorMoya, C-
dc.contributor.authorNorenzayan, A-
dc.contributor.authorPlacek, CD-
dc.contributor.authorSoler, M-
dc.contributor.authorVardy, T-
dc.contributor.authorWeigel, J-
dc.contributor.authorWillard, A-
dc.contributor.authorXygalatas, D-
dc.contributor.authorPurzycki, B-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-03T15:42:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-03T15:42:32Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-06-
dc.identifier.citationBaimel, A., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q., Bolyanatz, A., Cohen, E., Handley, C., Henrich, J., Kundtová Klocová, E., Lang, M., Lesogorol, C., Mathew, S., McNamara, R., Moya, C., Norenzayan, A., Placek, C.D., Soler, M., Vardy, T., Weigel, J., Willard, A., Xygalatas, D. and Purzycki, B. (2022) 'Material insecurity predicts greater commitment to moralistic and less commitment to local deities: a cross-cultural investigation', Religion, Brain & Behavior, 12 (1-2), pp. 4-17. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006287.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2153-599X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24528-
dc.descriptionSupplemental data for this article can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006287.-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). The existential security hypothesis predicts that in the absence of more successful secular institutions, people will be attracted to religion when they are materially insecure. Most assessments, however, employ data sampled at a state-level with a focus on world religions. Using individual-level data collected in societies of varied community sizes with diverse religious traditions including animism, shamanism, polytheism, and monotheism, we conducted a systematic cross-cultural test (N = 1820; 14 societies) of the relationship between material insecurity (indexed by food insecurity) and religious commitment (indexed by both beliefs and practices). Moreover, we examined the relationship between material security and individuals’ commitment to two types of deities (moralistic and local), thus providing the first simultaneous test of the existential security hypothesis across co-existing traditions. Our results indicate that while material insecurity is associated with greater commitment to moralistic deities, it predicts less commitment to local deity traditions.en_US
dc.format.extent4 - 17-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherRoutledge (Taylor & Francis Group)en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectReligious commitmenten_US
dc.subjectExistential insecurityen_US
dc.subjectmoralistic godsen_US
dc.subjectcross-culturalen_US
dc.titleMaterial insecurity predicts greater commitment to moralistic and less commitment to local deities: a cross-cultural investigationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/2153599x.2021.2006287-
dc.relation.isPartOfReligion, Brain & Behavior-
pubs.issue1-2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume12-
dc.identifier.eissn2153-5981-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf2.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons