Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24126
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Y-
dc.contributor.authorBaynes, A-
dc.contributor.authorRenner, KO-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, M-
dc.contributor.authorScrimshaw, MD-
dc.contributor.authorRoutledge, EJ-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-16T15:36:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-16T15:36:45Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-14-
dc.identifier87-
dc.identifier.citationWang, Y., Baynes, A., Renner, K.O., Zhang, M., Scrimshaw, M. and Routledge, E.J. (2022) ‘Uptake, Elimination and Effects of Cosmetic Microbeads on the Freshwater Gastropod Biomphalaria glabrata’, Toxics, 10 (2), 87, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.3390/toxics10020087..en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24126-
dc.description.abstractCopyright: © 2022 by the authors. The presence of plastic cosmetic microbeads in the environment due to their extensive use in society and inevitable dispersal into wastewater is concerning. Therefore, it is vital to understand the processes of microplastic uptake and elimination by aquatic organisms, and to further assess their potential to cause harmful effects and wider impacts. We therefore investigated the short-term (48-h) and long-term (21-d) uptake, elimination, and effects of exposure to polyethylene microbeads (a mixture of fragments and spheres extracted from commercially available facial scrubs) on the freshwater snail, Biomphalaria glabrata. We found fast uptake in the short-term (75 μg/g/h) and the long-term (6.94 μg/g/h) in B. glabrata exposed to 800 particles/200-mL and 80 particles/200-mL, respectively. Irregular fragments were more easily ingested and egested compared to spheres (ANOVA, p < 0.05) in both 48-h and 21-d exposures. The mean size of the fragments in B. glabrata tissues (413 ± 16 μm) after 48-h exposure was significantly larger than that of the standard sample (369 ± 26 μm) (ANOVA, F3,20 = 3.339, p = 0.033), suggesting that aggregation in the gut may occur. Floating feces containing microbeads were observed in the long-term exposure, which could alter the fate, behavior, and bioavailability of egested microbeads. No significant effects on survival and growth were shown within 48-h or 21-d exposure periods. Thus, further studies on the specific features of microplastics (e.g., their shape and size) influencing uptake and elimination, as well as toxic molecular mechanisms, should be explored in future ecotoxicological studies.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 13-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectingestionen_US
dc.subjectaggregationen_US
dc.subjecttoxicityen_US
dc.subjectmicrobeadsen_US
dc.subjectsnailen_US
dc.titleUptake, Elimination and Effects of Cosmetic Microbeads on the Freshwater Gastropod Biomphalaria glabrataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10020087-
dc.relation.isPartOfToxics-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume10-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf3.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons