Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23859
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeo, A-
dc.contributor.authorPalade, V-
dc.contributor.authorHuda, MN-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-31T17:15:31Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-31T17:15:31Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-11-
dc.identifier5422-
dc.identifier.citationDeo, A., Palade, V. and Huda, M.N. (2021) ‘Centralised and Decentralised Sensor Fusion-Based Emergency Brake Assist’, Sensors, 21 (16), 5422, pp. 1-29. doi: 10.3390/s21165422.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23859-
dc.description.abstractCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. Many advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are currently trying to utilise multi-sensor architectures, where the driver assistance algorithm receives data from a multitude of sen-sors. As mono‐sensor systems cannot provide reliable and consistent readings under all circum-stances because of errors and other limitations, fusing data from multiple sensors ensures that the environmental parameters are perceived correctly and reliably for most scenarios, thereby substan-tially improving the reliability of the multi‐sensor‐based automotive systems. This paper first high-lights the significance of efficiently fusing data from multiple sensors in ADAS features. An emergency brake assist (EBA) system is showcased using multiple sensors, namely, a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor and camera. The architectures of the proposed ‘centralised’ and ‘decentral-ised’ sensor fusion approaches for EBA are discussed along with their constituents, i.e., the detection algorithms, the fusion algorithm, and the tracking algorithm. The centralised and decentralised architectures are built and analytically compared, and the performance of these two fusion architectures for EBA are evaluated in terms of speed of execution, accuracy, and computational cost. While both fusion methods are seen to drive the EBA application at an acceptable frame rate (~20fps or higher) on an Intel i5‐based Ubuntu system, it was concluded through the experiments and analyt-ical comparisons that the decentralised fusion‐driven EBA leads to higher accuracy; however, it has the downside of a higher computational cost. The centralised fusion‐driven EBA yields compara-tively less accurate results, but with the benefits of a higher frame rate and lesser computational cost.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 29-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectsensor fusionen_US
dc.subjectautonomous drivingen_US
dc.subjectADASen_US
dc.subjectobject detection and trackingen_US
dc.titleCentralised and decentralised sensor fusion‐based emergency brake assisten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s21165422-
dc.relation.isPartOfSensors-
pubs.issue16-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume21-
dc.identifier.eissn1424-8220-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf12.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons