Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23388
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, AC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sumpter, JP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Depledge, MH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-27T09:24:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11 | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-27T09:24:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-10-26 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Johnson, A.C., Sumpter, J.P. and Depledge, M.H. (2021) 'The Future of the Weight‐of‐Evidence Approach: A Response to Suter's Comments', Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 40 (11), pp. 2947 - 2949. doi: 10.1002/etc.5215. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0730-7268 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23388 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2021 The Authors. Authors’ Response: We are grateful to Suter (2021) for noting our effort (Johnson et al., 2021) and for the role that he and his co-workers have played (and continue to play) in championing the weight-of-evidence (WoE) approach. As Suter has pointed out, the field is far from stagnant and enjoys continuing debate within parts of the community (Suter, 2021). With regard to his response to our article, we see no reason to criticize the Hill criteria (Hill, 1965) but find that, while agreeing with Suter that they are not a perfect fit for our field, they are of enduring value and are readily adaptable. We consider that there remain a number of issues that both hinder the take-up of WoE and have yet to be resolved in the decision-making process over whether a chemical is a threat or not. We suggest reasons behind the worldwide poor take-up of WoE. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | NERC grant NE/S000100/1 for the ChemPop project. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 2947 - 2949 | - |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | - |
dc.language | en | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
dc.title | The Future of the Weight‐of‐Evidence Approach: A Response to Suter's Comments | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5215 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | - |
pubs.issue | 11 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | - |
pubs.volume | 40 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1552-8618 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | 49.52 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License