Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23160
Title: | Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries |
Authors: | Randall, AK Leon, G Basili, E Martos, T Boiger, M Baldi, M Hocker, L Kline, K Masturzi, A Aryeetey, R Bar-Kalifa, E Boon, SD Botella, L Burke, T Carnelley, K Carr, A Dash, A Fitriana, M Gaines, SO Galdiolo, S Claire M, H Joo, S Kanth, B Karademas, E Karantzas, G Landolt, SA McHugh, L Milek, A Murphy, E Natividade, JC Portugal, A Quiñones, Á Relvas, AP Rumondor, PCB Rusu, P Sallay, V Saul, LA Schmitt, DP Sels, L Shujja, S Taylor, LK Ozguluk, SB Verhofstadt, L Yoo, G Zemp, M Donato, S Totenhagen, CJ van Eickels, RL Anaba, EA Beauchemin-Roy, S Berry, A Brassard, A Chesterman, S Ferguson, L Fonseca, G Gaugue, J Geonet, M Hermesch, N Knox, L Lafontaine, M-F Lawless, N Londero-Santos, A Major, S Marot, TA Mullins, E Otermans, PCJ Ariela F, P Parise, M Parvin, R De, M Péloquin, K Rebelo, B Righetti, F Romano, D Salavati, S Samrock, S Serea, M Seok, CB Sotero, L Stafford, O Thomadakis, C Topcu-Uzer, C Ugarte, C Yun, LW Simon-Zámbori, P Siau, CS Duca, D-S Filip, C Park, H Wearen, S Bodenmann, G Chiarolanza, C |
Keywords: | COVID-19;distress;dyadic coping;multination;relationship quality |
Issue Date: | 26-Aug-2021 |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
Citation: | Randall, A.K., et al. (2022) 'Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 39 (1), pp. 3 - 33. doi: 10.1177/0 2654075211034236. |
Abstract: | Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the “new normal”—social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented. |
Description: | A correction has been published: Erratum to Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship ... available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02654075211061907 |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23160 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211034236 |
ISSN: | 0265-4075 |
Other Identifiers: | ORCID iD: Ashley K. Randall https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3794-4163 ORCID iD: Stanley O. Gaines, Jr. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4937-6485 ORCID iD: Pauldy C.J. Otermans https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8495-348X ORCID iD: David Schmitt https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7089-0983 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). | 2.71 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License