Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23024
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorParupudi, RV-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, H-
dc.contributor.authorKolokotroni, M-
dc.contributor.authorTavares, J-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T18:56:31Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-29T18:56:31Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07-17-
dc.identifier117412-
dc.identifier.citationParupudi, R.V., Singh, H., Kolokotroni, M., and Tavares, J. (2021) 'Long term performance analysis of low concentrating photovoltaic (LCPV) systems for building retrofit', Applied Energy, 300, 117412, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117412.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0306-2619-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23024-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2021 The Author(s). Low concentrating photovoltaic (LCPV) systems offer viable solution for generating higher energy output per unit cell area compared to a typical flat PV panel, making them potential candidates for building retrofit. However, the best LCPV geometry for a given location is yet to be identified. The current study investigates the technical, economic and environmental feasibility of three geometrically equivalent LCPV designs installed at a building within Brunel University London (UK). The studied LCPV systems comprised of Asymmetric Compound Parabolic Concentrating (ACPC), Compound Parabolic Concentrating (CPC) and V-Trough optical concentrators with the post-truncation geometric concentration ratios of 1.53, 1.46, 1.40 respectively. The performances of the prototypes have been monitored every 15 min over 10 months and analyzed on hourly, daily, and monthly basis. Performance parameters such as reference yield, array yield, performance ratio, electrical conversion efficiency and the generated energy output per unit area have been derived and presented. Payback periods have been estimated in two separate scenarios. Measurements have showed that the ACPC integrated LCPV achieved the highest annual optical efficiency generating the highest amount of electrical energy per unit cell area of 246.2 kWh/m2 compared to CPC-LCPV, V-Trough-LCPV and conventional flat modules which produced 224.6 kWh/m2, 196.1 kWh/m2 and 185.4 kWh/m2 respectively. One particular conclusion of the study is that the ACPC based LCPVs perform better in locations where diffuse component of solar radiation is predominant as in the case of the UK. Consequently, ACPC based LCPV modules are recommended for the building retrofit in such locations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union’s H2020 research and innovation programmeen_US
dc.format.extent1 - 11-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectlow concentrating photovoltaics (LCPV)en_US
dc.subjectasymmetric Compound Parabolic Concentrator (ACPC)en_US
dc.subjectcompound parabolic concentrator (CPC)en_US
dc.subjectV-Troughen_US
dc.subjectbuildingsen_US
dc.subjectdiffuse radiation-
dc.titleLong term performance analysis of low concentrating photovoltaic (LCPV) systems for building retrofiten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117412-
dc.relation.isPartOfApplied Energy-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume300-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9118-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf3.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons