Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22934
Title: Preferences and constraints: the value of economic games for studying human behaviour
Authors: Pisor, AC
Gervais, MM
Purzycki, BG
Ross, CT
Keywords: social science;laboratory in the field;cross-cultural comparisons;methods;experiments;replication
Issue Date: 3-Jun-2020
Publisher: Royal Society Publishing
Citation: Pisor, A.C., Gervais, M.M., Purzycki, B.G. and Ross, C.T. (2020) 'Preferences and constraints: the value of economic games for studying human behaviour: The value of economic games', Royal Society Open Science, 7(6), 192090, pp. 1-14. doi: 10.1098/rsos.192090.
Abstract: © 2020 The Authors. As economic games have spread from experimental economics to other social sciences, so too have critiques of their usefulness for drawing inferences about the ‘real world’. What these criticisms often miss is that games can be used to reveal individuals' private preferences in ways that observational and interview data cannot; furthermore, economic games can be designed such that they do provide insights into real-world behaviour. Here, we draw on our collective experience using economic games in field contexts to illustrate how researchers can strategically alter the framing or design of economic games to draw inferences about private-world or real-world preferences. A detailed case study from coastal Colombia provides an example of the subtleties of game design and how games can be combined fruitfully with self-report data. We close with a list of concrete recommendations for how to modify economic games to better match particular research questions and research contexts.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22934
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.192090
Other Identifiers: 192090
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons