Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22232
Title: Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies
Authors: Eriksson, K
Strimling, P
Gelfand, M
Van Lange, P
de Barra, M
103 other authors
Issue Date: 5-Mar-2021
Publisher: Nature Research
Citation: Eriksson, K., Strimling, P., Gelfand, M., Van Lange, P., de Barra, M. et al. [103 other authors]. (2021) 'Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies', Nature Communications, 12, 1481, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9
Abstract: Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Norm enforcement may be important for resolving conflicts and promoting cooperation. However, little is known about how preferred responses to norm violations vary across cultures and across domains. In a preregistered study of 57 countries (using convenience samples of 22,863 students and non-students), we measured perceptions of the appropriateness of various responses to a violation of a cooperative norm and to atypical social behaviors. Our findings highlight both cultural universals and cultural variation. We find a universal negative relation between appropriateness ratings of norm violations and appropriateness ratings of responses in the form of confrontation, social ostracism and gossip. Moreover, we find the country variation in the appropriateness of sanctions to be consistent across different norm violations but not across different sanctions. Specifically, in those countries where use of physical confrontation and social ostracism is rated as less appropriate, gossip is rated as more appropriate.
Description: 26 April 2021: This article has been updated. A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22955-x. Data availability: All data and materials are available at OSF (https://osf.io/pm5kc/), including the raw data underlying Figs. 1–3 and SPSS syntax for analyses. A reporting summary for this Article is available as a Supplementary Information file. Source data are provided with this paper.
Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9, published online 5 March 2021. The original version of this Article contained an error in the author affiliations. Cecilia Reyna was incorrectly associated with ‘Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC). Facultad de Psicología (UNC), Ciudad Universitaria, Bv. de la Reforma esquina, Enfermera Gordillo s/n, Córdoba, Argentina.’ instead of the correct ‘Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), CABA, República Argentina.’ This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22232
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9
Other Identifiers: 1481
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.76 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons