Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21817
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSabo, A-
dc.contributor.authorKueh, YC-
dc.contributor.authorArifin, WN-
dc.contributor.authorKim, YH-
dc.contributor.authorKuan, G-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T14:25:42Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-01-
dc.date.available2020-11-13T14:25:42Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-28-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, 2020, 15 (9 September)en_US
dc.identifier.issnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239725-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21817-
dc.description.abstractBackground This study aimed to determine the validity of the Malay-translated version scales for assessing the social support and physical environment for exercise activities. Method The study was a cross-sectional design in nature, using self-reported questionnaires among the university students in Malaysia. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling approach. Perceptions regarding social support and physical environment were assessed using the Malay-translated version scales. The standard forward-backwards translation was conducted to translate the English version of the scales to the Malay version. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to validate the translated version scales; composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) were computed. Results A total of 857 students participated in this study (female: 49.1%, male: 50.9%). The mean age of the participants was 20.2 (SD = 1.6). The fit indices of the initial hypothesized measurement models (social support and physical environment) were not satisfactory. Further improvements were made by adding covariances between residuals’ items within the same factor for each hypothesized model. The final re-specified measurement models demonstrated adequate factor structure for the social support scale with 24 items (CFI = .932, TLI = .920, SRMR = .054, RMSEA = .061), and the physical environment scale with five items (CFI = .994, TLI = .981, SRMR = .013, RMSEA = .054). The CR was .918 for family support, .919 for friend support, .813 for perceived availability, and .771 for perceived quality. The AVEs were .560 for family support, .547 for friend support, .554 for perceived availability, and .628 for perceived quality. The intra-class correlation (ICC) based on test-retest was .920 for family support, .984 for friend support, .895 for availability of facilities, and .774 for quality of facilities. Conclusion The Malay version of the social support scale for exercise and the physical environment scale for physical activity were shown to have adequate psychometric properties for assessing perceived social support and physical environment among the university students in Malaysia. Perspective This study presented the psychometric properties of the social support and physical environment scales based on CFA and was the first to translate these scales from the original English version to the Malay version.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLOSen_US
dc.subjectMalay-translated version scalesen_US
dc.subjectexercise activitiesen_US
dc.subjectsocial supporten_US
dc.subjectphysical environmenten_US
dc.subjectconfirmatory factor analysisen_US
dc.subjectcomposite reliabilityen_US
dc.subjectaverage variance extracteden_US
dc.titleThe validity and reliability of the Malay version of the social support for exercise and physical environment for physical activity scalesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239725-
dc.relation.isPartOfPLoS ONE-
pubs.issue9 September-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume15-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf1.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.