Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21753
Title: Biomechanical comparison of standing posture and during trot between German shepherd and Labrador retriever dogs
Authors: Humphries, A
Shaheen, AF
Gómez Álvarez, CBG
Keywords: glycogen storage diseases;skeletal joints;hip;body limbs;dogs;body weight;kinematics;elbow
Issue Date: 2-Oct-2020
Publisher: PLOS
Citation: Humphries, A., Shaheen, A.F. and Gómez Álvarez, C.B.G. (2020 ) 'Biomechanical comparison of standing posture and during trot between German shepherd and Labrador retriever dogs', PLoS ONE, 15 (10), e0239832, pp. 1 - 18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239832.
Abstract: Copyright: © 2020 Humphries et al. It is widely accepted that canine breeds stand and move differently. The prevalence of various musculoskeletal disorders such as hip and elbow dysplasia is also different between breeds. German shepherd dog (GSD) and Labrador retriever dog (LRD) are two large breeds with different conformations that have high prevalence of these disorders. This study quantifies the movement and standing posture of twelve healthy GSDs and twelve healthy LRDs to identify biomechanical similarities and differences that may be linked to sub-optimal hip and elbow mechanics. A pressure walkway and a motion capture system obtained measures of kinetics, kinematics and conformation during standing and trot. During standing, LRDs carry a greater percentage of the weight on the forelimbs (69%±5% vs. GSDs: 62% ±2%, p<0.001) and their body Centre of Pressure (CoP) is located more cranially (p<0.001). GSDs had a greater pelvic tilt (79°±8 vs. 66°±9°, p = 0.004), more flexed stifles (44°±9° vs. LRDs: 34°±10°, p<0.05) and hocks (58°±11° vs. 26°±9°, p<0.01) and more extended hips (-10°±11° vs. 30°±12°, p<0.001). During trot, the GSDs' CoP had a longer anterior-posterior trajectory (151%±22% vs. LRDs: 93%±25% of the withers height, p<0.001). Stride parameters and loading of limbs were similar when normalised to the size and weight of the dog, respectively. The LRDs had a more extended thoracolumbar angle (p<0.001) and a less flexed lumbosacral angle (p<0.05). The LRDs' hip remained flexed during trot whereas the GSDs' hip joint was less flexed during swing (p<0.001) and more extended in late stance and early swing (p<0.001). In conclusion, the LRDs and GSDs differ in the way they stand and move and this would result in different loading pattern of the joints. Further investigation is required to determine the extent to which biomechanical differences are linked to musculoskeletal problems presented clinically.
Description: Data Availability: The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/PV4UJ).
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/21753
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239832
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Aliah F. Shaheen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2492-8818
e0239832
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright: © 2020 Humphries et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.1.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons