Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10959
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchmitz, N-
dc.contributor.authorGariépy, G-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, KJ-
dc.contributor.authorMalla, A-
dc.contributor.authorBoyer, R-
dc.contributor.authorStrychar, I-
dc.contributor.authorLesage, A-
dc.contributor.authorWang, J-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-03T16:11:58Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-10-
dc.date.available2015-06-03T16:11:58Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, 8(12): ( 2013)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0083088-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10959-
dc.description© 2013 Schmitz et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Self-rated health (SRH) is a single-item measure that is one of the most widely used measures of general health in population health research. Relatively little is known about changes and the trajectories of SRH in people with chronic medical conditions. The aims of the present study were to identify and describe longitudinal trajectories of self-rated health (SRH) status in people with diabetes. Methods: A prospective community study was carried out between 2008 and 2011. SRH was assessed at baseline and yearly at follow-ups (n=1288). Analysis was carried out through trajectory modeling. The trajectory groups were subsequently compared at 4 years follow-up with respect to functioning. Results: Four distinct trajectories of SRH were identified: 1) 72.2% of the participants were assigned to a persistently good SRH trajectory; 2) 10.1% were assigned to a persistently poor SRH trajectory; 3) mean SRH scores changed from good to poor for one group (7.3%); while 4) mean SRH scores changed from poor to medium/good for another group (10.4%). Those with a persistently poor perception of health status were at higher risk for poor functioning at 4 years follow-up than those whose SRH scores decreased from good to poor. Conclusions: SRH is an important predictor for poor functioning in diabetes, but the trajectory of SRH seems to be even more important. Health professionals should pay attention to not only SRH per se, but also changes in SRH over time.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Operating Grant MOP-84574 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). GG was supported by a doctoral fellowship from the CIHR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_US
dc.languageeng-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSelf-rated health (SRH)en_US
dc.subjectPopulation health research.en_US
dc.subjectChronic medical conditionsen_US
dc.subjectDiabetesen_US
dc.subjectTrajectory modelingen_US
dc.titleTrajectories of self-rated health in people with diabetes: Associations with functioning in a prospective community sampleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083088-
dc.relation.isPartOfPLoS ONE-
pubs.issue12-
pubs.volume8-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Social Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Social Sciences/Psychology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups/Centre for Research into Entrepreneurship, International Business and Innovation in Emerging Markets-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups/Brunel Centre for Contemporary Writing-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute of Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups/Multidisclipary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Life Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf291.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.