Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8956
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAcera, A-
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, A-
dc.contributor.authorTrapero-Bertran, M-
dc.contributor.authorSoteras, P-
dc.contributor.authorSanchez, N-
dc.contributor.authorBonet, JM-
dc.contributor.authorManresa, JM-
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo, P-
dc.contributor.authorToran, P-
dc.contributor.authorPrieto, G-
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-26T14:06:49Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-26T14:06:49Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research, 11: 278, 2011en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22011387en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8956-
dc.descriptionCopyright @ 2011 Acera et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.description.abstractA high percentage of cervical cancer cases have not undergone cytological tests within 10 years prior to diagnosis. Different population interventions could improve coverage in the public system, although costs will also increase. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and the costs of three types of population interventions to increase the number of female participants in the screening programmes for cancer of the cervix carried out by Primary Care in four basic health care areas.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFondo de Investigación Sanitaria del Instituto Carlos III de Madriden_US
dc.languageeng-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen_US
dc.subjectDouble-Blind Methoden_US
dc.subjectEarly Detection of Canceren_US
dc.subjectEpithelial Cellsen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMass Screeningen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPapillomavirus Infectionsen_US
dc.subjectPatient Acceptance of Health Careen_US
dc.subjectSpainen_US
dc.subjectUterine Cervical Neoplasmsen_US
dc.titleEconomic evaluation of three populational screening strategies for cervical cancer in the county of Valles Occidental: CRICERVA clinical trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-278-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Leavers-
Appears in Collections:Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf302.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.