Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8956
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Acera, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rodriguez, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Trapero-Bertran, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Soteras, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sanchez, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bonet, JM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Manresa, JM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hidalgo, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Toran, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Prieto, G | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-26T14:06:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-26T14:06:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Health Services Research, 11: 278, 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6963 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22011387 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8956 | - |
dc.description | Copyright @ 2011 Acera et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A high percentage of cervical cancer cases have not undergone cytological tests within 10 years prior to diagnosis. Different population interventions could improve coverage in the public system, although costs will also increase. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and the costs of three types of population interventions to increase the number of female participants in the screening programmes for cancer of the cervix carried out by Primary Care in four basic health care areas. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria del Instituto Carlos III de Madrid | en_US |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.subject | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject | Cost-Benefit Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Double-Blind Method | en_US |
dc.subject | Early Detection of Cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | Epithelial Cells | en_US |
dc.subject | Female | en_US |
dc.subject | Follow-Up Studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject | Mass Screening | en_US |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject | Papillomavirus Infections | en_US |
dc.subject | Patient Acceptance of Health Care | en_US |
dc.subject | Spain | en_US |
dc.subject | Uterine Cervical Neoplasms | en_US |
dc.title | Economic evaluation of three populational screening strategies for cervical cancer in the county of Valles Occidental: CRICERVA clinical trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-278 | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel | - |
pubs.organisational-data | /Brunel/Leavers | - |
Appears in Collections: | Publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | 302.76 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.