Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/887
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavis, P-
dc.contributor.authorMadsen, J-
dc.coverage.spatial30en
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-26T20:38:01Z-
dc.date.available2007-06-26T20:38:01Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Finance Working papers, Brunel University, 01-12en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/887-
dc.description.abstractThe share market boom in the 1990s is often linked to the acceleration in labour productivity over the same period. This paper explores the suggestions that labour productivity may be an inaccurate measure of firm’s cash flow which underlies equity valuations, and that innovations in productivity in the 1990s may have had only have temporary effects on capital productivity, the key element of the more correct measure of cash flow. Using a century of data for the OECD countries it is shown empirically that the link of productivity to share returns is indeed strongest for capital productivity, but generally the link is weaker that is sometimes maintained in the literature.en
dc.format.extent139787 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBrunel Univesityen
dc.subjectProductivity, share returns, ‘new economy’en
dc.titleProductivity and equity returns: A century of evidence for 9 OECD countriesen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01-12.pdf136.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.