Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8654
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLampropoulou, S-
dc.contributor.authorNowicky, AV-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-14T13:44:56Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-14T13:44:56Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 112(3), 1167 - 1175, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn1439-6327-
dc.identifier.urihttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00421-011-2074-1en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8654-
dc.descriptionThis is the author's accepted manuscript. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2074-1.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to examine the reliability and validity of the numerical rating scale (0-10 NRS) for rating perception of effort during isometric elbow flexion in healthy people. 33 individuals (32 ± 8 years) participated in the study. Three re-test measurements within one session and three weekly sessions were undertaken to determine the reliability of the scale. The sensitivity of the scale following 10 min isometric fatiguing exercise of the elbow flexors as well as the correlation of the effort with the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the flexor muscles were tested. Perception of effort was tested during isometric elbow flexion at 10, 30, 50, 70, 90, and 100% MVC. The 0-10 NRS demonstrated an excellent test–retest reliability [intra class correlation (ICC) = 0.99 between measurements taken within a session and 0.96 between 3 consecutive weekly sessions]. Exploratory curve fitting for the relationship between effort ratings and voluntary force, and underlying EMG showed that both are best described by power functions (y = ax b ). There were also strong correlations (range 0.89–0.95) between effort ratings and EMG recordings of all flexor muscles supporting the concurrent criterion validity of the measure. The 0-10 NRS was sensitive enough to detect changes in the perceived effort following fatigue and significantly increased at the level of voluntary contraction used in its assessment (p < 0.001). These findings suggest the 0-10 NRS is a valid and reliable scale for rating perception of effort in healthy individuals. Future research should seek to establish the validity of the 0-10 NRS in clinical settings.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSchool of Health Science and Social Care, Brunel Universityen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_US
dc.subjectNumeric rating scaleen_US
dc.subjectPerception of efforten_US
dc.subjectScale sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectEMGen_US
dc.subjectFatigueen_US
dc.subjectCorrelationen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the numeric rating scale for perception of effort during isometric elbow flexion exerciseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2074-1-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP/College of Health and Life Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP/College of Health and Life Sciences/Dept of Clinical Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups/Centre for Research into Entrepreneurship, International Business and Innovation in Emerging Markets-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups/Brunel Centre for Contemporary Writing-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute of Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Centre for Research in Rehabilitation-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups/Multidisclipary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH)-
Appears in Collections:Community Health and Public Health
Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf502.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.