Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8651
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Jrai, A-
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Fernandez, J-
dc.contributor.authorTsolakis, A-
dc.contributor.authorMegaritis, A-
dc.contributor.authorTheinnoi, K-
dc.contributor.authorCracknell, RF-
dc.contributor.authorClark, RH-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-14T13:16:47Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-14T13:16:47Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationFuel, 88(6), 1031 - 1041, 2009en_US
dc.identifier.issn0016-2361-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236108004936en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8651-
dc.descriptionThis is the post-print version of the final paper published in Fuel. The published article is available from the link below. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. Copyright @ 2008 Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this work, the effects of a standard ultra-low sulphur diesel (ULSD) fuel and a new, ultra-clean synthetic GTL (gas-to-liquid) fuel on the performance, combustion and emissions of a single-cylinder, direct injection, diesel engine were studied under different operating conditions with addition of simulated reformer product gas, referred to as reformed EGR (REGR). For this purpose various levels of REGR of two different compositions were tested. Tests with standard EGR were also carried out for comparison. Experiments were performed at four steady state operating conditions and the brake thermal efficiency, combustion process and engine emission data are presented and discussed. In general, GTL fuel resulted in a higher brake thermal efficiency compared to ULSD but the differences depended on the engine condition and EGR/REGR level and composition. The combustion pattern was significantly modified when the REGR level was increased. Although the extent of the effects of REGR on emissions depended on the engine load, it can be generally concluded that an optimal combination of GTL and REGR significantly improved both NOx and smoke emissions. In some cases, NOx and smoke emission reductions of 75% and 60%, respectively, were achieved compared to operation with ULSD without REGR. This offers a great potential for engine manufacturers to meet the requirements of future emission regulations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipShell Global Solutions UK, the Government of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) and the Royal Thai Government.en_US
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectReformed EGRen_US
dc.subjectGas-to-liquid fuelen_US
dc.subjectDieselen_US
dc.subjectEmissionsen_US
dc.subjectPremixed combustionen_US
dc.titlePerformance, combustion and emissions of a diesel engine operated with reformed EGR. Comparison of diesel and GTL fuellingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.12.001-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP/College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff TxP/College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences/Dept of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups/Centre for Research into Entrepreneurship, International Business and Innovation in Emerging Markets-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups/Brunel Centre for Contemporary Writing-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Engineering and Design - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Engineering and Design - URCs and Groups/Centre for Advanced Powertrain and Fuels Research-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute of Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups/Multidisclipary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH)-
Appears in Collections:Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf507.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.