Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8546
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBroadhurst, S-
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-03T11:07:25Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-03T11:07:25Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationDigital Creativity, 23(3-4), 225 - 238, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn1462-6268-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14626268.2012.709941en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8546-
dc.descriptionThis is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Digital Creativity, 23(3-4), 225 - 238, 2012. Copyright @ 2012 Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14626268.2012.709941.en_US
dc.description.abstractAssisted by the rapid growth of digital technology, which has enhanced its ambitions, performance is an increasingly popular area of artistic practice. This article seeks to contextualise this within two methodologically divergent yet complimentary intellectual tendencies. The first is the work of the philosopher Merleau-Ponty, who recognised that our experience of the world has an inescapably ‘embodied’ quality, not reducible to mental accounts, which can be vicariously extended through specific instrumentation. The second is the developing field of neuroaesthetics; that is, neurological research directed towards the analysis, in brain-functional terms, of our experiences of objects and events which are culturally deemed to be of artistic significance. I will argue that both these contexts offer promising approaches to interpreting developments in contemporary performance, which has achieved critical recognition without much antecedent theoretical support.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectPerformance and technologyen_US
dc.subjectArt and perceptionen_US
dc.subjectAesthetic theorisationen_US
dc.subjectDefamiliarisationen_US
dc.subjectMerleau-Pontyen_US
dc.subjectExtended bodyen_US
dc.subjectVisible and invisibleen_US
dc.subjectEmbodied experienceen_US
dc.subjectNeuroaesthetic approachen_US
dc.subjectVisual perceptionen_US
dc.titleMerleau-Ponty and neuroaesthetics: Two approaches to performance and technologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2012.709941-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Arts-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Arts/Drama-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups/Centre for Contemporary and Digital Performance-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies-
Appears in Collections:Theatre
Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf533.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.