Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8411
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllison, R-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, PH-
dc.contributor.authorKilbride, C-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, JL-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-12T14:34:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-12T14:34:35Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationFamily Practice, 25(5), 355 - 361, 2008en_US
dc.identifier.issn0263-2136-
dc.identifier.urihttp://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/5/355en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8411-
dc.descriptionCopyright @ The Author 2008. This article is available open access through the publisher’s website at the link below.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Patients who have had one stroke are at increased risk of another. Secondary prevention strategies that address medical risk factors and promote healthy lifestyles can reduce the risk. However, concordance with secondary prevention strategies is poor and there has been little research into patient and carer views. Objectives. To explore the experiences of patients and carers of receiving secondary prevention advice and use these to inform the development of an educational resource. Methods. A total of 38 participants (25 patients and 13 carers) took part in the study which used an action research approach. Focus groups and interviews were undertaken with patients and carers who had been discharged from hospital after stroke (between 3 and 24 months previously). Framework analysis was used to examine the data and elicit action points to develop an educational resource. Results. Participants’ main concern was their desire for early access to information. They commented on their priorities for what information or support they needed, the difficulty of absorbing complex information whilst still an in-patient and how health professionals’ use of language was often a barrier to understanding. They discussed the facilitators and barriers to making lifestyle changes. The educational resource was developed to include specific advice for medical and lifestyle risk factors and an individual action plan. Conclusion. An educational resource for secondary prevention of stroke was developed using a participatory methodology. Our findings suggest that this resource is best delivered in a one-to-one manner, but further work is needed to identify its potential utility.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPeninsula Primary Care Research Networken_US
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectAction researchen_US
dc.subjectLifestyle changeen_US
dc.subjectSecondary preventionen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.titleSecondary prevention of stroke: Using the experiences of patients and carers to inform the development of an educational resourceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn048-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Health Sciences & Social Care-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Health Sciences & Social Care/Physiotherapy-
Appears in Collections:Community Health and Public Health
Physiotherapy
Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Notice.pdf40.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.