Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8392
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, Q-
dc.contributor.authorGhobadian, A-
dc.contributor.authorGallear, D-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-08T09:45:29Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-08T09:45:29Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Production Economics, 141(2), 605 - 618, 2013en_US
dc.identifier.issn0925-5273-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552731200415Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8392-
dc.descriptionThis is the post-print version of the final paper published in International Journal of Production Economics. The published article is available from the link below. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. Copyright @ 2013 Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.description.abstractKnowledge is recognised as an important source of competitive advantage and hence there has been increasing academic and practitioner interest in understanding and isolating the factors that contribute to effective knowledge transfer between supply chain actors. The literature identifies power as a salient contributor to the effective operation of a supply chain partnership. However, there is a paucity of empirical research examining how power among actors influences knowledge acquisition and in turn the performance of supply chain partners. The aim of this research is to address this gap by examining the relationship between power, knowledge acquisition and supply chain performance among the supply chain partners of a focal Chinese steel manufacturer. A structured survey was used to collect the necessary data. Two conceptually independent variables – ‘availability of alternatives’ and ‘restraint in the use of power’ – were used to assess actual and realised power, respectively. Controlling for contingencies, we found that the flow of knowledge increased when supply chain actors had limited alternatives and when the more powerful actor exercised restraint in the use of power. Moreover, we found a positive relationship between knowledge acquisition and supply chain performance. This paper enriches the literature by empirically extending our understanding of how power affects knowledge acquisition and performance.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectSupply chain partnershipen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge acquisitionen_US
dc.subjectPoweren_US
dc.subjectSupply chain performanceen_US
dc.titleKnowledge acquisition in supply chain partnerships: The role of poweren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.019-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/Brunel Business School-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/Brunel Business School/Business-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups/Centre for Research into Entrepreneurship, International Business and Innovation in Emerging Markets-
Appears in Collections:Business and Management
Publications
Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf777.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.