Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8191
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXydopoulos, G-
dc.contributor.authorStergioulas, L-
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-25T11:02:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-03-25T11:02:57Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS) Accepted Refereed Papers, 2013, 17-18 October, Windsor, United Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-908549-11-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.iseing.org/emcis/emcis2013/EMCISWebsite/EMCISProceedings2013.htmlen
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8191-
dc.descriptionCopyright @ 2013 EMCIS.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of this study is to review and analyse various evaluation frameworks used to assess the operational effectiveness of various Information Technology (IT) processes/applications and identify their strengths in order to form a new holistic framework for economic evaluation of web applications. This research aims to address the need for a new holistic evaluation framework for the purpose of the evaluation of the medical web applications. Over the last decade more and more, companies used accountancy techniques such as the frameworks analysed in this research. This new holistic framework that was developed will include also steps regarding the indirect and intangible costs and benefits identification and their incorporation in the evaluation process. Moreover the new emerging market of the medical websites and the embedded on them web applications requires also a new evaluation framework that will provide accurate results in the estimation of the efficiency of an investment on them. The paper first presents an introduction about why economic evaluation is important when evaluating the Information Technology in organizations. Various studies are reviewed, which highlight the ever increasing importance of integrating economic evaluation processes, such as Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Return on Investment (ROI), into systems and processes of organizations and economic organizations, and analyse the factors that govern their role. Finally, the evaluation frameworks and methods that are found in these studies should be used as a part of a proactive systematic action plan that the organizations could use to avoid budget reduction due to incorrect planning. The next part of this study includes a comprehensive presentation and review of past frameworks used to evaluate Information Technology. The frameworks that are reviewed are the Framework for evaluation of information systems, the Information Technology Adoption Model (ITAM), the Total Evaluation and Acceptance Methodology (TEAM) framework, the ROI Process Model and HOT-fit evaluation framework for Health Information Systems.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrunel Universityen_US
dc.subjectEvaluation frameworken_US
dc.subjectMedical web applicationsen_US
dc.titleTowards an evaluation framework for medical web applicationsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Administration and Support Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Administration and Support Staff/Administration and Support Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Info. Systems, Comp & Maths-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Info. Systems, Comp & Maths/Computer Science-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/Brunel Business School - URCs and Groups/Centre for Research into Entrepreneurship, International Business and Innovation in Emerging Markets-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Arts - URCs and Groups/Brunel Centre for Contemporary Writing-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute for Ageing Studies-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Brunel Institute of Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Health Sciences and Social Care - URCs and Groups/Centre for Systems and Synthetic Biology-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups/Centre for Information Systems Research-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/University Research Centres and Groups/School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics - URCs and Groups/Multidisclipary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH)-
Appears in Collections:Publications
Computer Science
Dept of Computer Science Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf683.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.