Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8066
Title: Bilateral Delimitation of the Caspian Sea and the Exclusion of Third Parties
Authors: Bantekas, I
Keywords: Caspian Sea;bilateralism;delimitation;Kazakhstan;pipelines
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2011
Publisher: Brill Academic Publishers
Citation: Bantekas, I. (2011) 'Bilateral Delimitation of the Caspian Sea and the Exclusion of Third Parties', International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 26(1), pp. 47 - 58. doi: 10.1163/157180811X541396.
Abstract: This article discusses the position of the littoral States of the body of water known as the Caspian Sea (hereinafter ‘the Caspian’), particularly on the basis of their numerous bilateral treaties and unilateral statements of action, with respect to the legal status and sui generis regimes of the Caspian. It is argued that these States have excluded the possibility that the Caspian be equated for legal purposes to a sea, but they have, nonetheless, employed legal formulae borrowed from the international law of the sea in order to delimit their respective maritime zones and other entitlements. The ambit of these rights is sketchy and they do not conclusively cover the entirety of inter-State relations in the Caspian. There is an urgent need for the adoption of a multilateral convention in order to remedy these gaps, if for no other reason than for the sake of investor confidence and the avoidance of future disputes.
Description: © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2011
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/8066
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157180811X541396
ISSN: 0927-3522
Appears in Collections:Law
Publications
Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdfEmbargoed indefinitely349.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.