Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6394
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLockton, D-
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-23T10:57:24Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-23T10:57:24Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationWorking Paper Series, Apr 2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2033231en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/6394-
dc.descriptionCopyright @ 2012 Social Services Research Groupen_US
dc.description.abstractWhen designing to influence behaviour for social or environmental benefit, does designers' intent matter? Or are the effects on behaviour more important, regardless of the intent involved? This brief paper explores -- in the context of design for behaviour change -- some treatments of design, intentionality, purpose and responsibility from a variety of fields, including Stafford Beer's "The purpose of a system is what it does" and Maurice Broady's perspective on determinism. The paper attempts to extract useful implications for designers working on behaviour-related problems, in terms of analytical or reflective questions to ask during the design process.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSocial Services Research Groupen_US
dc.titlePOSIWID and determinism in design for behaviour changeen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033231-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Engineering & Design-
pubs.organisational-data/Brunel/Brunel Active Staff/School of Engineering & Design/Design-
Appears in Collections:Design
Publications
Brunel Design School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SSRN-id2033231.pdf1.97 MBUnknownView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.