Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5696
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChivu, CM-
dc.contributor.authorReidpath, DD-
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-29T11:43:09Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-29T11:43:09Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health 10: 473, Aug 2010en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5696-
dc.descriptionThis article has been made available through the Brunel Open Access Publishing Fund and is available from the specified link - Copyright @ 2010 Chivu and Reidpathen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Area deprivation is a known determinant of health. It is also known that area deprivation is associated with lower impact health promotion. It is less well known, however, whether deprived areas are less responsive to health promotion, or whether they are less exposed. Using data from a national, school-based campaign to promote vaccination against the human papilloma virus (HPV), the relationship between area deprivation and exposure was examined. METHODS: Taking advantage of a health promotion campaign to provide information to schools about HPV vaccination, a cross sectional study was conducted to examine the relationship between area level, social deprivation, and take-up of (i.e., exposure to) available health promotion material. The sample was 4,750 schools across England, including government maintained and independent schools. The relationship between area deprivation and exposure was examined using bi- and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: It was found that schools in the least deprived quintile had 1.32 times the odds of requesting health promotion materials than schools in the most deprived areas (p = .01). This effect was independent of the school size, the type of school, and the geographic region. Conclusion The relationship between area deprivation and the impact of health promotion may be due, at least in part, to differential levels of exposure. The study was limited in scope, pointing to the need for more research, but also points to potentially important policy implications.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleSocial deprivation and exposure to health promotion. A study of the distribution of health promotion resources to schools in Englanden_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-473-
Appears in Collections:Community Health and Public Health
Brunel OA Publishing Fund
Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf210.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.