Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5123
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavis, EP-
dc.contributor.authorObasi, U-
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-13T11:52:10Z-
dc.date.available2011-05-13T11:52:10Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Finance Working Paper, Brunel University, 09-26en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/5123-
dc.description.abstractThe link from deposit insurance to bank risk taking has been widely analysed, but has been the subject of relatively little empirical work. This work contributes to the existing literature by exploring microeconomic aspects of the deposit insurance–bank risk relationship. It employs four of the five IMF core financial soundness indicators, using data from financial statements for 914 banks in 64 countries. It also disaggregates deposit insurance by individual design features. Results, generated using GMM, suggest that deposit insurance mainly affects bank risk through its relationship with profitability and asset quality. An optimal deposit insurance system might have features such as voluntary membership, no cover for foreign currency deposits, no coinsurance, be unfunded, and administered by a private sector manager with the insurance cost borne fully by the private sector.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrunel Universityen_US
dc.titleDeposit insurance systems and bank risken_US
dc.typeResearch Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0926[1].pdf176.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.