Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3567
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDenver, D-
dc.contributor.authorHands, G-
dc.coverage.spatial13en
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T13:56:08Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-31T13:56:08Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationElectoral Studies. 25 (4) 664-676en
dc.identifier.issn0261-3794-
dc.identifier.otherhttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30412/description#description-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3567-
dc.description.abstractOver the past decade, clear evidence has been produced showing that effective constituency campaigning in British general elections can lead to better electoral performance. This evidence has challenged the received wisdom that only national campaigning is significant and that efforts at local level are meaningless rituals. Denver et al. have focused on the role of the national parties in strengthening local campaigns in target seats; Seyd and Whiteley, by contrast, have stressed the importance of local party membership. This article attempts to assess the relative electoral impact of national party co-ordination and constituency party membership and suggests that the impact of these two factors varies by party.en
dc.format.extent167113 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectConstituency campaigning; Elections; Party members; Party centralization; Britainen
dc.titleThe relative electoral impact of central party co-ordination and size of party membership at constituency levelen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
Appears in Collections:Politics and International Relations
Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf163.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.