Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3538
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWebb, P-
dc.contributor.authorFisher, J-
dc.coverage.spatial11en
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-23T15:00:39Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-23T15:00:39Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationPolitics. 23 (1) 10-20en
dc.identifier.issn0263-3957-
dc.identifier.otherThe definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/3538-
dc.description.abstractThis article analyses party employees, one of the most under-researched subjects in the study of British political parties. We draw on a blend of quantitative and qualitative data in order to shed light on the social and political profiles of Labour Party staff, and on the question of their professionalisation. The latter theme is developed through a model derived from the sociology of professions. While a relatively limited proportion of party employees conform to the pure ideal-type of professionalism, a considerably greater number manifest enough of the core characteristics of specialisation, commitment, mobility, autonomy and self-regulation to be reasonably described as 'professionals in pursuit of political outcomes'.en
dc.format.extent198205 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwellen
dc.titleProfessionalism and the Millbank Tendency: The Political Sociology of New Labour's employeesen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00175-
Appears in Collections:Politics and International Relations
Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf193.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.