Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28632
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBirgand, G-
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Sánchez, E-
dc.contributor.authorHansen, S-
dc.contributor.authorGastmeier, P-
dc.contributor.authorLucet, JC-
dc.contributor.authorFerlie, E-
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, A-
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, R-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T08:32:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-25T08:32:03Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-20-
dc.identifierORCiD: Enrique Castro-Sánchez https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-9496-
dc.identifier.citationBirgand, A. et al. (2018) 'Comparison of governance approaches for the control of antimicrobial resistance: Analysis of three European countries', Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 2018, 7 (1), 28, pp. 1 - 12. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0321-5.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28632-
dc.descriptionAvailability of data and materials: Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.en_US
dc.description.abstractPolicy makers and governments are calling for coordination to address the crisis emerging from the ineffectiveness of current antibiotics and stagnated pipe-line of new ones - antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Wider contextual drivers and mechanisms are contributing to shifts in governance strategies in health care, but are national health system approaches aligned with strategies required to tackle antimicrobial resistance? This article provides an analysis of governance approaches within healthcare systems including: priority setting, performance monitoring and accountability for AMR prevention in three European countries: England, France and Germany. Advantages and unresolved issues from these different experiences are reported, concluding that mechanisms are needed to support partnerships between healthcare professionals and patients with democratized decision-making and accountability via collaboration. But along with this multi-stakeholder approach to governance, a balance between regulation and persuasion is needed.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE). ECS has received an Early Career Research Fellowship from the Antimicrobial Research Collaborative at Imperial College London, and acknowledges the support of the Florence Nightingale Foundation. GB has received an Early Career Research Fellowship from the Antimicrobial Research Collaborative at Imperial College London, and acknowledges the support of the Welcome trust. RA is supported by a NIHR Fellowship in knowledge mobilisation. RA, GB,ECS, EF, AH gratefully acknowledge the support of ESRC as part of the Antimicrobial Cross Council initiative supported by the seven UK research councils, and also the support of the Global Challenges Research Fund.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 12-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central (part of Springer Nature)en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s). 2018. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectgovernanceen_US
dc.subjectantimicrobial resistanceen_US
dc.subjectinfection controlen_US
dc.subjecthealthcare settingsen_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.titleComparison of governance approaches for the control of antimicrobial resistance: Analysis of three European countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0321-5-
dc.relation.isPartOfAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume7-
dc.identifier.eissn2047-2994-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s). 2018. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.441.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons