Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28515
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCretu, I-
dc.contributor.authorTindale, A-
dc.contributor.authorAbbod, M-
dc.contributor.authorBalachandran, W-
dc.contributor.authorKhir, AW-
dc.contributor.authorMeng, H-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T11:42:26Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-12T11:42:26Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-12-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ioana Cretu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-625X-
dc.identifierORCiD: Maysam Abbod https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8515-7933-
dc.identifierORCiD: Wamadeva Balachandran https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4806-2257-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ashraf William Khir https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-2891-
dc.identifierORCiD: Hongying Meng https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8836-1382-
dc.identifier101382-
dc.identifier.citationCretu, I. et al. (2024) 'A comparison of different methods to maximise signal extraction when using central venous pressure to optimise atrioventricular delay after cardiac surgery', IJC Heart and Vasculature, 51, 101382, pp. 1 - 9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101382.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28515-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Our group has shown that central venous pressure (CVP) can optimise atrioventricular (AV) delay in temporary pacing (TP) after cardiac surgery. However, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is influenced both by the methods used to mitigate the pressure effects of respiration and the number of heartbeats analysed. This paper systematically studies the effect of different analysis methods on SNR to maximise the accuracy of this technique. Methods: We optimised AV delay in 16 patients with TP after cardiac surgery. Transitioning rapidly and repeatedly from a reference AV delay to different tested AV delays, we measured pressure differences before and after each transition. We analysed the resultant signals in different ways with the aim of maximising the SNR: (1) adjusting averaging window location (around versus after transition), (2) modifying window length (heartbeats analysed), and (3) applying different signal filtering methods to correct respiratory artefact. Results: (1) The SNR was 27 % higher for averaging windows around the transition versus post-transition windows. (2) The optimal window length for CVP analysis was two respiratory cycle lengths versus one respiratory cycle length for optimising SNR for arterial blood pressure (ABP) signals. (3) Filtering with discrete wavelet transform improved SNR by 62 % for CVP measurements. When applying the optimal window length and filtering techniques, the correlation between ABP and CVP peak optima exceeded that of a single cycle length (R = 0.71 vs. R = 0.50, p < 0.001). Conclusion: We demonstrated that utilising a specific set of techniques maximises the signal-to-noise ratio and hence the utility of this technique.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Heart Foundation (No. FS/19/73/34690).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 9-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectatrioventricular delayen_US
dc.subjectCRTen_US
dc.subjectCVPen_US
dc.subjectfilteringen_US
dc.subjectoptimisationen_US
dc.subjecttemporary pacingen_US
dc.titleA comparison of different methods to maximise signal extraction when using central venous pressure to optimise atrioventricular delay after cardiac surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101382-
dc.relation.isPartOfIJC Heart and Vasculature-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume51-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-9067-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).5.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons