Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28465
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOzbilgin, MF-
dc.contributor.authorErbil, C-
dc.contributor.authorDemirbağ, O-
dc.contributor.authorGündoğdu, N-
dc.contributor.authorŞimşek Demirbağ, K-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-04T11:29:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-04T11:29:49Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-04-
dc.identifierORCiD: Mustafa F Özbilgin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-9534-
dc.identifier1309119-
dc.identifier.citationOzbilgin, M.F. et al. (2024) 'Institutional suicide as anomie: decedents speak out for work-related suicides through a Durkheimian exploration of suicide notes in a context without institutional responsibilization for suicide prevention', Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1309119, pp. 1 - 16. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1309119.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28465-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Publicly available information has been analyzed in this study. Links to the online sources have not been included with the article in order to protect the privacy of the individuals affected. Queries regarding the source material should be directed to the corresponding author.en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Drawing on Durkheim’s historical theorization of suicide, we extend his concept of anomic suicide, which is suicide due to a lack of social regulation, to introduce the concept of institutional suicide. We define institutional suicide as suicide due to the absence or decline of institutional policies, practices, and discourses for prevention. In this study, we explore the mechanisms for institutional suicides based on suicide notes Turkey, in a context without institutional responsibilization for prevention. Turkey provides a significant context for studying institutional suicides as policies, practices, and discourses for suicide prevention have been declining for some decades. Methods: Drawing on publically available suicide notes and narratives in Turkish media outlets, we analyze 17 suicide notes and responses from their institutions of work and friends, family, and colleagues. Findings and Discussion: We identify two mechanisms that lead to institutional suicides: (1) dehumanization due to lack of recognition and (2) misrecognition through a devaluation of potential. We extend the theory of anomie to institutional settings and offer social policy suggestions to improve institutional responses based on co-design based on suicide notes to prevent institutional suicides and call for institutional responsibilization for preventing work-related suicides.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 16-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 Ozbilgin, Erbil, Demirbağ, Gündoğdu and Şimşek Demirbağ. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectinstitutional suicideen_US
dc.subjectanomieen_US
dc.subjectrecognitionen_US
dc.subjectmisrecognitionen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional responsibilizationen_US
dc.titleInstitutional suicide as anomie: decedents speak out for work-related suicides through a Durkheimian exploration of suicide notes in a context without institutional responsibilization for suicide preventionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1309119-
dc.relation.isPartOfFrontiers in Sociology-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume9-
dc.identifier.eissn2297-7775-
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderOzbilgin, Erbil, Demirbağ, Gündoğdu and Şimşek Demirbağ-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 Ozbilgin, Erbil, Demirbağ, Gündoğdu and Şimşek Demirbağ. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.998.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons