Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28186
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAl-Zu'bi, M-
dc.contributor.authorFan, M-
dc.contributor.authorAnguilano, L-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-03T10:16:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-03T10:16:47Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-22-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Mohammad Al-Zu'bi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8788-5440-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Mizi Fan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6609-3110-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Lorna Anguilano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3426-4157-
dc.identifier100421-
dc.identifier.citationAl-Zu'bi, M., Fan, M. and Anguilano, L. (2023) 'Parametric investigation of flexural performance of concrete prisms retrofitted with near-surface mounted FRP bars', Composites Part C: Open Access, 12 (October 2023), 100421, pp. 1 - 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2023.100421.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28186-
dc.descriptionData availability: Data will be made available on request.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2023 The Authors. This study investigates the impact of flexural retrofitting on the load-bearing capacity, ductility and failure modes of concrete prisms using the NSM-FRP technique, considering four design parameters. Some specimens were retrofitted with NE only, while others incorporated FRP (i.e. CFRP, GFRP or BFRP) reinforcement bars alongside NE to assess the influence of presence of FRP reinforcement on the specimens’ performance. The study also examines changing the position of GFRP reinforcement bars (cantered or along the groove's edge), using different numbers of CFRP bars (one, two or three) and considering three groove dimensions (8 × 8 mm², 10 × 10 mm² and 12 × 12 mm²). Results showed that NE-only retrofitting increased the capacity by about 38 % compared to the non-retrofitted specimens, with negligible impact on ductility. Introducing FRP reinforcement led to an approximately twofold increase in capacity and ductility compared to NE-only retrofitting. Placing GFRP reinforcement bars along the edge of the groove minimally affected the capacity but reduced ductility by about 24 %. Increasing the number of CFRP bars from one to three significantly improved capacity and ductility but increased the risk of debonding failures. Using larger groove sizes (10 × 10 mm²) enhanced capacity of the CFRP-retrofitted specimens, slightly reduced GFRP-retrofitted concrete capacity and improved ductility for both. The 12 × 12 mm² groove size reduced capacity but increased ductility. The 10 × 10 mm² groove size effectively prevented debonding failures observed with other sizes.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 11-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectconcrete membersen_US
dc.subjectflexural retrofittingen_US
dc.subjectNSM-FRP techniqueen_US
dc.subjectparametric studyen_US
dc.titleParametric investigation of flexural performance of concrete prisms retrofitted with near-surface mounted FRP barsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2023.100421-
dc.relation.isPartOfComposites Part C: Open Access-
pubs.issueOctober 2023-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume12-
dc.identifier.eissn2666-6820-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).16.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons