What do voters want from an online voting experience?: Results from user testing of a prototype i-voting app

Abstract

The UK does not offer remote online voting now. But, as digital services and digital citizen-government interactions continue to grow, voting could be offered remotely online (i-voting) in future alongside postal and in-person ballots. So what might i-voting look like, and how might voters respond? What makes an i-voting experience positive or negative? We designed a prototype voting app that mirrors the traditional ballot paper. We asked potential voters to use it, on 3 different digital devices, and compared it with the in-person experience. Our study involved a diverse sample of 32 people from the Brunel community who kindly gave their time to test the alternative voting mode and share their feedback and opinions with us. We are grateful for their participation. Our key findings are: • Gaining first-hand experience of the app was associated with either maintaining or improving willingness to vote online – the ‘maintainers’ generally had a high initial willingness to vote online, while the ‘improvers’ were initially less keen. • If i-voting were to become an option in future, our respondents want to see stronger security and authentication features on an i-voting app, education to inform voters about how i-voting works, and transparency about data risks, actors involved, and the security measures in place to prevent fraud and malpractice. Further testing, on a larger scale, could usefully explore which voter groups might benefit most from the option of i-voting, and how design features and voter engagement could address security and data protection concerns.