Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27769
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNolan, CM-
dc.contributor.authorKaliaraju, D-
dc.contributor.authorJones, SE-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, S-
dc.contributor.authorBarker, R-
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, JA-
dc.contributor.authorWynne, S-
dc.contributor.authorMan, W-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-30T14:52:41Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-30T14:52:41Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-05-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Claire M. Nolan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-599X-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Jessica A Walsh http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9103-3945-
dc.identifier.citationNolan, C.M. et al. (2019) 'Home versus outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: A propensity-matched cohort study', Thorax, 74, pp. 996 - 998. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212765.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0040-6376-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27769-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Home-based exercise has been proposed as an equivalent treatment strategy to supervised outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), but it is not known whether its implementation into clinical practice produces similar benefits to those observed in trials. We compared the real-world responses of 154 patients with COPD undergoing home-based exercise with a matched group attending supervised PR. We observed smaller improvements in exercise capacity with home-based exercise compared with PR, but similar improvements in quality of life. We propose that supervised PR remains the standard of care, with home-based exercise a less effective alternative for those unable to attend PR.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by a project grant from the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Northwest London (CLAHRC for Northwest London). CMN, JAW and SCW are supported by an NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Grant (PB-PG-0816-20022); SEJ is supported by a NIHR Doctoral Research Fellowship (DRF-2015-08-004); SP is supported by a British Lung Foundation IPF Project Grant (IPFPG17-15) and REB is supported by a NIHR Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowship (CDRF-2017-03-018).en_US
dc.format.extent996 - 998-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishingen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This article has been accepted for publication in Thorax 2019;74:996-998, following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212765 (see: https://www.bmj.com/company/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Non-Open-Access-Articles-September-2018.pdf).-
dc.rights.urihttps://www.bmj.com/company/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Non-Open-Access-Articles-September-2018.pdf-
dc.titleHome versus outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: A propensity-matched cohort studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212765-
dc.relation.isPartOfThorax-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume74-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-3296-
dc.rights.holderAuthor(s) (or their employer(s))-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This article has been accepted for publication in Thorax 2019;74:996-998, following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212765 (see: https://www.bmj.com/company/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Non-Open-Access-Articles-September-2018.pdf).317.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.