Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27741
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Z-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, X-
dc.contributor.authorLi, S-
dc.contributor.authorLi, L-
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Z-
dc.contributor.authorLai, H-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-26T20:39:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-26T20:39:15Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-21-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Liang Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0451-7045-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Zhiyuan Feng https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3783-9155-
dc.identifier.citationZhao, Z. et al. (2022) 'Microstructure Characterization and Battery Performance Comparison of MOF-235 and TiO<inf>2</inf>-P25 Materials', Crystals, 12 (2), 152, pp. 1 - 8. doi: 10.3390/cryst12020152.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27741-
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: Data sharing not applicable.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 by the authors. The growing interest in energy storage has led to the urgent need for the development of high-performance cathode electrodes. The commercialized materials MOF-235 and TiO2-P25 exhibit characteristics that may be suitable as electrodes but there are inherent challenges that have yet to be addressed in the literature. In this study, a high-pressure hydrothermal synthesized MOF-235 and sol-gel-made TiO2-P25 were tested for battery performance. The results indicate that MOF-235 does not possess the desired performance due to uncontrollable agglomeration. On the other hand, TiO2-P25 showed good cycling life, and the performance can be further optimized by doping and minimizing the particle size. Additionally, SEM and TEM were applied for surface characterization, providing evidence that mesoporous TiO2-25 inhibits photo-generated carrier recombination. The mesoporous energy storage mechanism of those two materials is also discussed. This research will provide technical support for the industrialization of those two mesoporous materials.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research received no external funding.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 8-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectTiO2-P25en_US
dc.subjectMOF-235en_US
dc.subjectnanocompositeen_US
dc.subjectTEMen_US
dc.subjectvoltametricen_US
dc.subjectmicrostructure characterizationen_US
dc.titleMicrostructure Characterization and Battery Performance Comparison of MOF-235 and TiO<inf>2</inf>-P25 Materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020152-
dc.relation.isPartOfCrystals-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume12-
dc.identifier.eissn2073-4352-
dc.rights.holderThe authors-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Design School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).3.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons