Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27642
Title: Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Authors: Trivedi, P
Patel, S
Edwards, G
Jenkins, T
Man, WD-C
Nolan, CM
Issue Date: 17-Oct-2023
Publisher: American Thoracic Society
Citation: Trivedi, P. et al. (2023) 'Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis', Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 0 (ahead of print), pp. [1] - [23]. doi: 10.1513/annalsats.202306-561oc.
Abstract: Rationale: Standing from a sitting position is an important activity of daily living. The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) is a simple physical performance test that measures the fastest time taken to stand five times from a chair with arms folded. It can be measured in most healthcare settings, including the home where traditional field walking tests may not be possible. The 5STS has been validated in community-dwelling older adults and people with COPD, but data in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are limited. Objective: The aims of this cohort study were to establish the construct validity, responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and minimal important difference (MID) of the 5STS in IPF. Methods: In 149 people with IPF, we compared 5STS to measures of lung function, exercise capacity, quadriceps strength, breathlessness and health-related quality of life. Responsiveness and effect sizes were determined by measuring 5STS before and after PR. The MID was estimated using anchor- and distribution-based methods. Results: The 5STS correlated significantly with incremental shuttle walk test (ISW) (r=-0.55), isometric quadriceps maximum voluntary contract (QMVC) (r=-0.45), Medical Research Council (MRC) score (r=0.40), Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ)-Total (r=-0.21) and King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease-Total (r=-0.21) but not forced vital capacity %predicted or quadriceps 1-repetition maximum (1RM). There was a significant but very weak correlation between change in 5STS and change in MRC (r=0.18), ISW (r=-0.21) and CRQ-Total (r=-0.26) but no significant correlation with change in 1RM (-0.12) or QMVC (r=-0.18). 5STS time improved with PR (median (25th, 75th centile) change: -1.97 (-3.47, -0.62) seconds; p<0.001). The effect size for 5STS was 0.66 and higher than quadriceps 1RM, QMVC and ISW. The mean (range) MID estimate was -1.93 (-1.85 to -2.10) seconds. Conclusions: In people with IPF, the 5STS is a valid physical performance measure that is responsive to exercise-based interventions and suitable for use in most healthcare settings.
Description: A CC BY or equivalent licence is applied to the Author Accepted Manuscript arising from this submission, in accordance with the grant’s open access conditions.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27642
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202306-561oc
ISSN: 2329-6933
Other Identifiers: ORCID iD: Timothy Jenkins https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-0725
ORCID iD: Claire M Nolan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-599X
Appears in Collections:Dept of Health Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). A Creative Commons (CC BY) Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) or equivalent licence is applied to the Author Accepted Manuscript arising from this submission, in accordance with the grant’s open access conditions. Originally Published in: Trivedi, P. et al. (2023) 'Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test: Responsiveness and Minimal Important Difference in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis', Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 0 (ahead of print), pp. [1] - [23]. DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202306-561oc (see: https://www.atsjournals.org/general/author).880.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons