Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27483
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoutra, V-
dc.contributor.authorGilmour, SG-
dc.contributor.authorParker, BM-
dc.contributor.authorMead, A-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-31T13:08:36Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-31T13:08:36Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-19-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Vasiliki Koutra https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1117-4554-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Ben M. Parker https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6858-8336-
dc.identifier.citationKoutra, V. et al. (2023) 'Design of Agricultural Field Experiments Accounting for both Complex Blocking Structures and Network Effects', Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 28 (3), pp. 526 - 548. doi: 10.1007/s13253-023-00544-3.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1085-7117-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27483-
dc.descriptionSupplementary Information is available online at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13253-023-00544-3#Sec13 .en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). We propose a novel model-based approach for constructing optimal designs with complex blocking structures and network effects for application in agricultural field experiments. The potential interference among treatments applied to different plots is described via a network structure, defined via the adjacency matrix. We consider a field trial run at Rothamsted Research and provide a comparison of optimal designs under various different models, specifically new network designs and the commonly used designs in such situations. It is shown that when there is interference between treatments on neighboring plots, designs incorporating network effects to model this interference are at least as efficient as, and often more efficient than, randomized row–column designs. In general, the advantage of network designs is that we can construct the neighbor structure even for an irregular layout by means of a graph to address the particular characteristics of the experiment. As we demonstrate through the motivating example, failing to account for the network structure when designing the experiment can lead to imprecise estimates of the treatment parameters and invalid conclusions.Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipESRC South Coast Doctoral Training Partnership, and the research was completed under EPSRC grant EP/T021624/1 Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Experiments.en_US
dc.format.extent526 - 548-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronics-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectdesign of experimentsen_US
dc.subjectconnected experimental unitsen_US
dc.subjectneighbor effectsen_US
dc.subjectnested row–column designsen_US
dc.subjecttreatment interferenceen_US
dc.titleDesign of Agricultural Field Experiments Accounting for both Complex Blocking Structures and Network Effectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-023-00544-3-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics-
pubs.issue3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume28-
dc.identifier.eissn1537-2693-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mathematics Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.1.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons