Brunel University Research Archive(BURA) preserves and enables easy and open access to all
types of digital content. It showcases Brunel's research outputs.
Research contained within BURA is open access, although some publications may be subject
to publisher imposed embargoes. All awarded PhD theses are also archived on BURA.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27397Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Roberts, H | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cowls, J | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hine, E | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mazzi, F | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsamados, A | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Taddeo, M | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Floridi, L | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-17T07:39:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-10-17T07:39:06Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-11-12 | - |
| dc.identifier | ORCID iD: Francesca Mazzi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6423-9147 | - |
| dc.identifier | ORCID iD: Luciano Floridi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5444-2280 | - |
| dc.identifier | 68 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Roberts, H. et al. (2021) 'Achieving a ‘Good AI Society’: Comparing the Aims and Progress of the EU and the US', Science and Engineering Ethics, 27 (6), 68, pp. 1 - 25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00340-7. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1353-3452 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27397 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Copyright . Over the past few years, there has been a proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) strategies, released by governments around the world, that seek to maximise the benefits of AI and minimise potential harms. This article provides a comparative analysis of the European Union (EU) and the United States’ (US) AI strategies and considers (i) the visions of a ‘Good AI Society’ that are forwarded in key policy documents and their opportunity costs, (ii) the extent to which the implementation of each vision is living up to stated aims and (iii) the consequences that these differing visions of a ‘Good AI Society’ have for transatlantic cooperation. The article concludes by comparing the ethical desirability of each vision and identifies areas where the EU, and especially the US, need to improve in order to achieve ethical outcomes and deepen cooperation. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1 - 25 | - |
| dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | - |
| dc.language | English | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer Nature | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | artificial intelligence | en_US |
| dc.subject | European Union | en_US |
| dc.subject | policy | en_US |
| dc.subject | United States | en_US |
| dc.subject | social good | en_US |
| dc.title | Achieving a ‘Good AI Society’: Comparing the Aims and Progress of the EU and the US | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00340-7 | - |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Science and Engineering Ethics | - |
| pubs.issue | 6 | - |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
| pubs.volume | 27 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-5546 | - |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Brunel Law School Research Papers | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | 848.87 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
