Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27389
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbrusci, E-
dc.contributor.authorMackenzie-Gray Scott, R-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-16T12:42:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-10-
dc.date.available2023-10-16T12:42:43Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-10-
dc.identifierORCiD ID: Elena Abrusci https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-5369-
dc.identifier.citationAbrusci, E & Mackenzie-Gray Scott, R. (2023) 'AI: we may not need a new human right to protect us from decisions by algorithms – the laws already exist' in The Conversation., pp. 1-3. https://theconversation.com/ai-we-may-not-need-a-new-human-right-to-protect-us-from-decisions-by-algorithms-the-laws-already-exist-214525.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27389-
dc.descriptionOnline Newsletter | URL : https://theconversation.com/ai-we-may-not-need-a-new-human-right-to-protect-us-from-decisions-by-algorithms-the-laws-already-exist-214525en_US
dc.description.abstractThere are risks and harms that come with relying on algorithms to make decisions. People are already feeling the impact of doing so. Whether reinforcing racial biases or spreading misinformation, many technologies that are labelled as artificial intelligence (AI) help amplify age-old malfunctions of the human condition. In light of such problems, calls have been made to create a new human right against being subject to automated decision-making (ADM), which the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) describes as “the process of making a decision by automated means without any human involvement”. Such systems rely on being exposed to data, whether factual, inferred, or created via profiling. But if effective regulation of ADM is the goal, creating new laws is probably not the way to go. Our research suggests we should consider a different approach. Legal frameworks for data protection, non-discrimination, and human rights already offer protection to people from the negative impacts of ADM. Rules from these bodies of law can also guide regulation more generally. We could therefore focus on ensuring that the laws we already have are properly implemented.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBrunel University London and University of Oxford provide funding as members of The Conversation UK. The Conversation UK receives funding from these organisationsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Conversation Trust (UK) Limiteden_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence (AI)en_US
dc.subjectHuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectAlgorithmen_US
dc.subjectTechnologyen_US
dc.subjectalgorithms at worken_US
dc.subjectAlgorithmic biasen_US
dc.subjectMachine learning algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectEducate meen_US
dc.titleAI: we may not need a new human right to protect us from decisions by algorithms – the laws already existen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf© You are free to republish the text of this article both online and in print. We ask that you follow some simple guidelines. Please note that images are not included in this blanket licence as in most cases we are not the copyright owner. Please do not edit the piece, ensure that you attribute the author, their institute, and mention that the article was originally published on The Conversation.459.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons